State v. Williams

CourtListener 10154773Scctapp06.06.2012

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD
NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Tony Williams, Appellant.
__________

Appeal From Kershaw County
G. Thomas Cooper Jr., Circuit Court Judge
__________

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-343
Submitted May 1, 2012 – Filed June 6, 2012
__________

APPEAL DISMISSED
__________

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of
Columbia.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
and Solicitor Daniel E. Johnson, all of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Tony Williams appeals his sentence, arguing the
circuit court erred in imposing a sentence that differed from the sentence
recommended by the State when the victim agreed to the State's
recommended sentence. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.