State v. Carelock

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Roshune L. Carelock, Appellant.

Appeal From Lancaster County

Brooks P. Goldsmith, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-287

Submitted April 2, 2012 - Filed May 9,
2012

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of
Columbia, and Roshune L. Carelock, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Douglas A. Barfield, Jr., of Lancaster,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Roshune
L. Carelock appeals his conviction for assault and battery of a
high and aggravated nature, arguing the circuit court erred in admitting the
testimony of a paramedic regarding statements made by the victim when the State
failed to disclose the paramedic's report prior to trial. Additionally,
Carelock filed a pro se brief. After a thorough review of the record and all briefs
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and HUFF and
SHORT, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.