CourtListener 10154595•SCDSS v. Sheree W.
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina
Department of Social Services, Respondent,
v.
Sheree W.,
Alfred W., James J., and Wendell B., Defendants,
Of whom Sheree
W. is the Appellant.
In the interest
of five minor children under the age of 18.
Appeal from Colleton County
Peter L. Fuge, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-164
Submitted March 1, 2012 Filed March 7,
2012
AFFIRMED
Robert J. Bonds, of Walterboro, for
Appellant.
Angela W. Abstance, of Denmark, and
Scarlet Bell Moore, of Greenville, for Respondent.
Heather Jones Galvin, of Bluffton, for
Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Sheree W. appeals the family court's order of removal. Upon a thorough review of the record and
the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law, pursuant to Ex
Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious
issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and grant
counsel's motion to be relieved.
AFFIRMED.[1]
FEW, C.J.,
HUFF and SHORT, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.