South v. South

CourtListener 10154594Scctapp07.03.2012

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

Judy B. South, Respondent,

v.

Brian L. South, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

Angela R. Taylor, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-165

Heard February 13, 2012 – Filed March 7,
2012   

AFFIRMED

Robert L. Jackson, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Alice D. Potter, of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Brian
L. South appeals the family court's order finding him in civil contempt
regarding his child support arrearages.  We affirm pursuant to Rule
220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities:  State v. McKnight, 352
S.C. 635, 646, 576 S.E.2d 168, 174 (2003) (finding an issue must be raised to
and ruled upon by the trial court to be preserved for appellate review); Hickman
v. Hickman, 301 S.C. 455, 456, 392 S.E.2d 481, 482 (Ct. App. 1990) (stating
a party cannot use Rule 59(e), SCRCP, to raise an issue to the court that could
have been raised prior to judgment).

AFFIRMED.

FEW, C.J., and
HUFF and SHORT, JJ., concur.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.