State v. Long

CourtListener 10154565Scctapp14.03.2012

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Appellant,

v.

Danny Long, Respondent.

Appeal from Laurens County

Eugene C. Griffith, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-184

Submitted March 1, 2012 – Filed March 14,
2012   

AFFIRMED

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J.
Shupe, and Assistant Attorney General William Blitch, Jr., all of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: The
State appeals the sentence imposed on Danny Long by the plea court, arguing the
plea court erred in crediting Long for time voluntarily spent in a residential
counseling center while he was out on bail.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority: State
v. Cox, 328 S.C. 371, 373, 492 S.E.2d
399, 400 (Ct. App. 1997) (holding sentencing issue unpreserved when an
objection was not made at the time the sentence was imposed).

AFFIRMED.

PIEPER, KONDUROS, and
GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.