CourtListener 10154552•State v. Abraham
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Shenard Abraham, Appellant.
Appeal From Darlington County
Ralph King Anderson, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-201
Submitted March 1, 2012 Filed March 21,
2012
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor William B. Rogers, Jr., of
Bennettsville, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Shenard Abraham appeals his conviction
for assault and battery with intent to kill, arguing the trial court erred in
denying his motion for a directed verdict. Specifically, Abraham contends he
acted in self-defense as a matter of law. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the
appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
WILLIAMS,
THOMAS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.