State v. Hayes

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Timothy Todd
Hayes, Appellant.

Appeal From Marion County

William H. Seals, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-088  

Submitted February 1, 2012 – Filed
February 22, 2012

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek,
of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, all of Columbia;
and Solicitor Ernest A. Finney, III, of Sumter, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Timothy Todd Hayes appeals his conviction for shoplifting. 
After a thorough review of the record and
all briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J.,
HUFF and SHORT, J.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.