Rednour v. Rednour

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. 

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

Michael Anthony
Rednour, Robert Ray Rednour, Bradford James Rednour, Rodney Jay Rednour, and
Nancy Davis Rednour, Respondents,

v.

Catherine Grigg
Rednour, Appellant.

Appeal From Cherokee County

J. Mark Hayes, II, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2012-UP-021 

Submitted January 3, 2012 – Filed January
25, 2012

AFFIRMED

J. Edwin McDonnell, of Spartanburg, for
Appellant.

Michael Dean Hamrick, of Spartanburg, for
Respondents.

PER CURIAM: Catherine
Grigg Rednour (Wife) appeals the trial court's finding of ouster and award of
fair use rental value to Michael Anthony Rednour, Robert Ray Rednour, Bradford
James Rednour, Rodney Jay Rednour, and Nancy Davis Rednour (collectively
Children).  Wife argues the trial court erred in finding ouster because the
only evidence presented was her exclusive possession of the property. 
Furthermore, Wife argues the trial court erred in awarding rental value when
the partitioned property was never income producing.  Wife failed to appeal the
trial court's additional ruling that "[e]ven if ouster had not occurred,
equity would require compensation to the [Children] for the loss of use of the
residence due to [Wife's] exclusive usage of the house since 2001."  We
affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority:  Jones v. Lott, 387
S.C. 339, 346, 692 S.E.2d 900, 903 (2010) ("Under the two issue rule,
where a decision is based on more than one ground, the appellate court will
affirm unless the appellant appeals all grounds because the unappealed ground
will become the law of the case." (citing Anderson v. Short, 323
S.C. 522, 525, 476 S.E.2d 475, 477 (1996))).

AFFIRMED.

SHORT,
WILLIAMS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.