State v. Ashford

CourtListener 10154405Scctapp25.01.2012

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Randolph F. Ashford, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

G. Thomas Cooper, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-035

Submitted January 3, 2012 – Filed January
25, 2012   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H.
Carter, of Columbia; and Randolph F. Ashford, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, and Solicitor Daniel E. Johnson, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Randolph F. Ashford appeals his convictions
for three counts of carjacking, two counts of assault with intent to kill, two
counts of kidnapping, a count of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, and a count
of first-degree burglary.  After a thorough review of the record and all briefs
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J.,
THOMAS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.