CourtListener 10154251•State v. Delaney
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Lamont Antwan
Delaney, Appellant.
Appeal From Charleston County
James C. Williams, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-443
Submitted October 1, 2011 Filed October
11, 2011
AFFIRMED
Appellate Defender Elizabeth A.
Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan M. Wilson, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Scarlett A. Wilson, of Charleston, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Lamont
Antwan Delaney appeals his convictions for trafficking in cocaine, trafficking
in cocaine base, possession with intent to distribute (PWID) cocaine within
proximity of a school, PWID cocaine base within proximity of a school, and
possession of a firearm during the commission of a violent crime. He argues
the circuit court erred in (1) denying his right to confront a witness against
him and (2) admitting an involuntary confession. We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities:
1. As to whether the circuit court
denied Delaney his confrontation rights: State v. Dunbar, 356 S.C. 138,
142, 587 S.E.2d 691, 694 (2003) ("A party may not argue one ground at
trial and an alternate ground on appeal.").
2. As to whether the
circuit court erred in finding Delaney's confession was voluntary: State v.
Franklin, 390 S.C. 535, 539, 702 S.E.2d 568, 570 (Ct. App. 2010) ("The
[circuit] court's factual conclusions as to the voluntariness of a statement
will not be disturbed on appeal unless so manifestly erroneous as to constitute
an abuse of discretion.").
AFFIRMED.
HUFF, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.