State v. Evans

CourtListener 10154236Scctapp19.10.2011

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR
RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2),
SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Eddie Evans, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

Reginald I. Lloyd, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-461 

Submitted October 1, 2011 – Filed October
19, 2011

AFFIRMED

Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Teresa A. Knox, Tommy Evans, Jr., and J.
Benjamin Aplin, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Eddie Evans appeals the circuit court's full
revocation of his probation, arguing the circuit court erred by finding he had
actual or constructive possession of a shotgun.  We affirm[1] pursuant to
Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority:  State v. Hicks,
387 S.C. 378, 379, 692 S.E.2d 919, 920 (2010) ("Where the ruling of the
trial judge is based on more than one ground, an appellate court must affirm
unless the appellant appeals all grounds upon which the ruling was based.").

AFFIRMED.

FEW, C.J.,
THOMAS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.