CourtListener 10154222•State v. Jordan
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT
BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Norwood Lee
Jordan, Appellant.
Appeal From Richland County
J. Michelle Childs, Circuit Court Judge
Opinion No. 2011-UP-474
Submitted October 1, 2011 Filed October
26, 2011
AFFIRMED
Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of Columbia, for Appellant.
J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Norwood Lee Jordan appeals the circuit court's order revoking his
probation, arguing the circuit court erred in finding Jordan remained on
probation. We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority: State
v. Picklesimer, 388 S.C. 264, 270, 695 S.E.2d 845, 848 (2010) (explaining that
"successful completion" of a community supervision program requires
the completion of a maximum of two continuous years without any violations or
revocations).
AFFIRMED.
FEW, C.J., THOMAS and KONDUROS, JJ.,
concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.