SCDSS v. William A.

CourtListener 10154171Scctapp25.08.2011

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department
of Social Services, Respondent,

v.

William A., Appellant.

In the interest of two minor children under
the age of 18.

Appeal From Berkeley County

Jack A. Landis, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-403  

Submitted August 15, 2011 – Filed August 25, 2011

AFFIRMED

Andrew S. Halio, of Charleston, for Appellant.

Paul C. White, of Moncks Corner, for Respondent.

Sean L. Keefer, of Charleston, for Guardian Ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: William A. appeals
the family court's final order terminating his parental rights to his minor
children.  See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (2010).  Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of facts and conclusions of law,
pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we
find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.  Accordingly, we affirm the family
court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.[1]

HUFF, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY,
JJ., concur.                                     

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.