CourtListener 10154168•SCDSS v. Tyesha H.
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina
Department of Social Services, Respondent,
v.
Tyesha R. H.,
Tyrone D., Johnnie Lee R., Defendants,
Of whom Tyesha
H. is the, Appellant.
In the interest of two minor children under the age of eighteen.
Appeal From Allendale County
Gerald C. Smoak, Jr., Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-408
Submitted August 15, 2011 Filed August
29, 2011
AFFIRMED
Elmer Kulmala, of Barnwell, for Appellant.
Amanda Frances Whittle, of Aiken, for
Respondent.
J. Morgan Kearse, of Allendale, for
Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Tyesha H. appeals from the family court's final order terminating her parental
rights to her two minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (2010). Upon a thorough review
of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law
pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we
find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family
court's ruling.
AFFIRMED.[1]
FEW, C.J.,
THOMAS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.