CourtListener 10154024•State v. Gregg
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Roscoe Gregg, Appellant.
Appeal From Marion County
Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-204
Submitted April 1, 2011 Filed May 4,
2011
AFFIRMED
Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, Assistant Attorney General Deborah R. J. Shupe, all of Columbia; and
Solicitor Edgar Lewis Clements, III, of Florence, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Roscoe Gregg pled guilty to possession of
cocaine, first offense. On appeal, Gregg argues the trial court erred in
accepting his guilty plea because no evidence was presented to prove the white
substance was cocaine. We
affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and
the following authorities: State v.
Passaro, 350 S.C. 499, 505, 567 S.E.2d 862, 866 (2002)
("[A] guilty plea generally constitutes a waiver of non-jurisdictional
defects and claims of violations of constitutional rights."); State v.
Lopez, 352 S.C. 373, 378, 574 S.E.2d 210, 213 (Ct. App. 2002) (finding
an issue must be raised to and ruled upon by the trial court in order to be
considered on appeal).
AFFIRMED.
HUFF, SHORT,
and PIEPER, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.