CourtListener 10153991•SCDSS v. S.W.
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina
Department of Social Services, Respondent,
v.
S.W. and J.N., Defendants,
Of Whom S.W. is
the Appellant.
In the interest
of a minor child under the age of 18 years.
Appeal From Berkeley County
Gordon B. Jenkinson, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-246
Submitted May 1, 2011 Filed May 24, 2011
AFFIRMED
Heather S. Shaw, of Charleston, for
Appellant.
Wolfgang Louis Kelly, of Moncks Corner,
for Respondent.
Sean Fredrick Keefer, of Charleston, for
Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: S.W. appeals
from the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her
minor child. See S.C.
Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (2010). Upon a thorough review of the record and the
family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte
Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues
warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.
AFFIRMED.[1]
WILLIAMS and
KONDUROS, JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.