SCDSS v. T.L.F.

CourtListener 10153917Scctapp28.04.2011

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina
Department of Social Services, Respondent,

v.

T. L. F.,
a.k.a. T.R.-F. and John Doe, Defendants,

Of whom, T.L.F.,
a.k.a. T.R-F. is the Appellant.

In the interest of a minor child under the age of 18.

Appeal From Sumter County

George M. McFaddin, Jr., Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2011-UP-192

Submitted April 1, 2011 – Filed April 28,
2011

AFFIRMED

John Evans James, III, of Winnsboro, for
Appellant.

Deborah Truett Nielsen, of Bishopville,
for Respondent.

Edgar R. Donnald, Jr., of Sumter, Guardian
Ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: T.L.F. appeals from the family court's final order terminating her parental
rights to her minor child.  See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (2010).  Upon a thorough review of the
record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant
to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no
meritorious issues warrant briefing.  Accordingly, we affirm the family court's
ruling.

AFFIRMED.[1]

WILLIAMS and
KONDUROS, JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur. 

 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.