CourtListener 10153854•State v. Blakeney
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Lisa Ann Blakeney, Appellant.
Appeal From York County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-043
Submitted January 1, 2011 Filed February
2, 2011
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John
W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of
Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin Scott Brackett, of York, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Lisa Ann Blakeney appeals her convictions for
possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine, assault and battery of a
high and aggravated nature, and failure to stop for a blue light. On appeal, Blakeney
argues the trial court's jury charge on reasonable doubt was erroneous and
confused the jury, and it lessened the State's burden of proof. After a thorough review of the record, counsel's brief,
and Blakeney's pro se brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991),
we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's
petition to be relieved.
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
HUFF and LOCKEMY, JJ., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.