CourtListener 10153806•In The Matter of Cedric White
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
In The Matter
Of The Care And Treatment Of Cedric Leandra White, Appellant.
Appeal From Charleston County
Deadra L. Jefferson, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-009
Submitted January 1, 2011 Filed January
24, 2011
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender LaNelle C. DuRant, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Deborah R. J. Shupe, all of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Cedric
Leandra White appeals his commitment to the South Carolina Department of Mental
Health under the Sexually Violent Predator Act. White argues the trial court
erred by improperly relying on Dr. Schwartz-Watt's diagnosis of an unspecified
sexual disorder during his second evaluation even though she had previously
found he did not meet the definition of a sexually violent predator. After a thorough review of the record and
counsel's brief, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), In
re McCoy, 360 S.C. 425, 427, 602 S.E.2d 58, 59 (2004) (adopting the Anders procedure for alleged no-merit appeals in sexually violent predator involuntary
commitment appeals), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
FEW, C.J., SHORT and
WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.