Fenollol Group v. Banister

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The Fenollol
Group, Inc., Respondent,

v.

Beasley Jo
Banister and Samuel Banister d/b/a Hilltop Diner, Appellants.

Appeal From Fairfield County

Brooks P. Goldsmith, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-535

Submitted December 1, 2010 – Filed
December 14, 2010

AFFIRMED

Creighton B. Coleman, of Winnsboro, for Appellants.

William Lee Duda, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: 
Appellants appeals from the trial court's grant of a temporary injunction.   We
affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority:  S.C. Dep't of Transp. v. First Carolina Corp. of S.C., 372 S.C. 295,301-02, 641 S.E.2d 903, 907 (2007)
(issues not raised to and ruled upon by the trial court will not be considered
on appeal). 

AFFIRMED.[1]

THOMAS,
PIEPER, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.