CourtListener 10153721•State v. Mackins
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Marquis D. R. Mackins, Appellant.
Appeal From York County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-482
Submitted November 1, 2010 Filed
November 4, 2010
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin Scott Brackett, of
York, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Marquis D. R. Mackins was convicted of four counts
of assault of a high and aggravated nature and one count of discharging a
firearm into an occupied vehicle and sentenced to an aggregate twenty years'
imprisonment. Mackins appeals, arguing the trial court erred in admitting
hearsay testimony in violation of Mackins's right to confrontation and
cross-examination. After a
thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to
be relieved.[1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
FEW, C.J., and SHORT and
WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.