CourtListener 10153684•State v. Holland
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Shawn Holland, Appellant.
Appeal From Horry County
Kristi Lea Harrington, Circuit Court Judge
Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-433
Submitted October 1, 2010 Filed October
11, 2010
APPEAL DISMISSED
Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
of Columbia; and Solicitor John Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Shawn
Holland was tried in his absence, convicted of breach of trust with fraudulent
intent, sentenced to seven years' imprisonment, and ordered to pay $2,500 in
restitution. Holland appeals the order of restitution, arguing the trial court
erred in ordering restitution without conducting a restitution hearing. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
SHORT,
THOMAS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.