State v. Whitehurst

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Don Ray
Whitehurst, Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

 Gordon G. Cooper, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2010-UP-459

Submitted October 1, 2010 – Filed October
21, 2010 

APPEAL DISMISSED

 Appellate Defender Kathrine Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Don
Ray Whitehurst appeals his probation revocation, arguing the revocation court
abused its discretion.  After a thorough
review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS,
PIEPER, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.