State v. Wilson, Timothy

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Timothy Wilson, Appellant.

Appeal From Lexington County

William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-472

Submitted October 1, 2010 – Filed October
28, 2010

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H.
Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Donald V. Meyers, of
Lexington, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Timothy
Wilson appeals his convictions for lewd act on a minor and four counts of
first-degree criminal sexual conduct with a minor.  He argues the trial court
erred in allowing the State to cross-examine the victim's mother concerning
allegations of sexual abuse in an unrelated matter.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS,
and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.