SCDSS v. Timothy B.

CourtListener 10153605Scctapp16.08.2010

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

Department of
Social Services, Respondent,

v.

Jody E., Aaron
E., Christopher M., and John Doe, Defendants,

Of whom Jody E.
is the, Appellant.

In the interests of two minor children under the age of 18.              

2009-DR-04-00215

Appeal From Anderson County

Tommy B. Edwards, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2010-UP-387

Submitted August 1, 2010 – Filed August
16, 2010

AFFIRMED

Carolyn E. Galloway, of Anderson, for
Appellant.

Amy C. Sutherland, of Greenville, for
Respondent.

Sandra Woodell Chipman, of Anderson, for
Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM:  Jody E. (Mother) appeals from the family
court's order terminating her parental rights to her minor children.  See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (2010).  Upon a thorough review of the record,
Mother's pro se brief, and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions
of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381
(1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.  Accordingly, we affirm[1] the family court's ruling. 

AFFIRMED.

WILLIAMS and
KONDUROS, JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.