CourtListener 10153598•State v. Phillips
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Jerome
Phillips, Appellant.
Appeal From York County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-392
Submitted August 2, 2010 Filed August
25, 2010
APPEAL DISMISSED
Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Jerome
Phillips appeals his plea of no contest for possession of crack cocaine, second
offense. On appeal, Phillips contends
the plea court erred in accepting his plea because he did not make an informed
and intelligent decision to plead guilty. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's
motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
FEW, C.J., KONDUROS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.