State v. Jordan

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

James Jones
Jordan, III, Appellant.

Appeal From Lancaster County

James E. Lockemy, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-365

Submitted June 1, 2010 – Filed July 14,
2010  

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster,
Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney
General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Douglas A. Barfield,
Jr., of Lancaster, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:    James Jones Jordan, III appeals his conviction and
sentence for assault on a correctional facility employee, arguing the trial
court (1) abused its discretion by not ordering he undergo a mental health
evaluation, and (2) his conviction violates double jeopardy.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

FEW, C.J., THOMAS, and
PIEPER, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.