Motsinger v. Williams

CourtListener 10153558Scctapp02.06.2010

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

Kenneth Dale
Motsinger, Respondent,

v.

Lura Williams, Appellant.

Appeal From Charleston County

R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-300

Submitted May 3, 2010 – Filed June 2, 2010   

AFFIRMED

Thomas R. Goldstein, of Charleston, for
Appellant.

Steven L. Smith, of N. Charleston, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:    Lura Williams appeals the trial court's grant of
partial summary judgment on Kenneth Dale Motsinger's breach of contract claim.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the
following authority:  Johnson v.
Sonoco Prod. Co., 381 S.C. 172, 177, 672 S.E.2d 567, 570 (2009) ("An
issue may not be raised for the first time in a motion to reconsider.").

AFFIRMED.

HUFF, SHORT, and WILLIAMS,
JJ. concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.