SCDSS v. Mandy S.

CourtListener 10153538Scctapp22.06.2010

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent,

v.

Timothy R. and Mandy S., Defendants,

Of Whom Mandy S. is the Appellant.

In the interest of J.S., a minor child under the
age of 18.

Appeal From York County

Robert E. Guess, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-322

Submitted April 1, 2010 – Filed June 22,
2010   

AFFIRMED

Myron B. Boloyan, of Lake Wylie, for
Appellant.

David E. Simpson, of York, for Respondent.

L. Dale Dove, of Rock Hill, for Guardian
Ad Litem.

PER CURIAM:  Mandy S. appeals the family court's order
terminating her parental rights to her minor child.  See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (2010).  Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's
findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen,
291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant
briefing.  Accordingly, we affirm[1] the family court's ruling and grant counsel's motion
to be relieved.  

AFFIRMED.

WILLIAMS, J.,
KONDUROS, J., and CURETON, A.J., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.