State v. Myra Christenbury

CourtListener 10153431Scctapp01.03.2010

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Myra G. Christenbury, Appellant.

Appeal From Cherokee County

 J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-169

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed March 1,
2010   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Senior Appellate Defender Joseph L.
Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Donald J. Zelenka, of Columbia; Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Myra G. Christenbury appeals her
convictions and sentences for murder and armed robbery.  She contends the trial
court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the issue of alibi.  After a
thorough review of the record, counsel's brief, and Christenbury's pro se brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Christenbury's
appeal and grant counsel's petition to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS,
and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.