State v. Robert Hughes

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Robert Lee
Hughes, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2010-UP-195

Submitted March 1, 2010 – Filed March 8,
2010

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, and Solicitor Warren Blair Giese, all of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Robert
Lee Hughes appeals his guilty plea for indecent exposure, arguing the trial
court erred in finding he should be screened for sexually violent predator
status without making a finding indecent exposure was a sexually violent
offense.  After a thorough
review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

PIEPER and GEATHERS, JJ.,
and CURETON, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.