State v. Shaw

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Dustin Olin
Shaw, Appellant.

Appeal From Lexington County

James W. Johnson, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-222

Submitted March 1, 2010 – Filed March 29,
2010

Affirmed

Benjamin A. Stitely, of Lexington, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
Senior Assistant Attorney General Norman Mark Rapoport, all of Columbia; and
Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dustin Olin Shaw appeals his convictions for
second-degree sexual exploitation of a minor.  Shaw argues the trial court
erred in allowing the admission of his written statement admitting he downloaded
and kept child pornography on his computer.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the
following authority: State v. Bailey, 298 S.C. 1, 5-6, 377 S.E.2d 581, 584 (1989) (finding
an issue unpreserved where appellant argued one ground at trial and an
alternative ground on appeal).

Affirmed.

SHORT,
WILLIAMS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.