CourtListener 10153364•State v. Dominic Derricotte
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Dominic M. Derricotte, Appellant.
Appeal From Charleston County
Deadra L. Jefferson, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-086
Submitted January 4, 2010 Filed February
3, 2010
APPEAL DISMISSED
Senior Appellate Defender Joseph L.
Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Donald J. Zelenka, all of Columbia; Solicitor Scarlett Anne Wilson, of
Charleston, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dominic
Derricotte appeals his concurrent sentences of life imprisonment and thirty
years for murder and armed robbery, respectively. Derricotte's contends the
trial court erred by allowing two of the State's witnesses to testify that the
victim described him as creepy. After a thorough review of the record, and counsel's brief,
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
SHORT, THOMAS,
and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.