State v. Eric Mance

CourtListener 10153337Scctapp11.02.2010

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Eric Mance, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-120

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed February
11, 2010  

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott; and Solicitor Warren Blair Giese, all of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Eric Mance was convicted of assault and
battery with intent to kill, armed robbery, and possession of a pistol by a
person convicted of a violent crime. Mance appeals arguing the trial court
erred in admitting statements he made several weeks prior to the robbery and
shooting.  After a thorough review of the record and both briefs pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Mance's appeal and grant counsel's
motion to be relieved.[1] 

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS,
PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.