SC DSS v. Natasha P.

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina
Department of Social Services, Respondent,

v.

Natasha P.,
Bruce C., John Doe, whose true name is unknown, Defendants,

Of Whom Natasha
P. is the

In the Interest
of K.P., a minor child under the age of 18. Appellant.

Appeal From Chester County

Brian M. Gibbons, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-003

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed January
12, 2010   

AFFIRMED

Joseph L. Raad, of Rock Hill, for
Appellant.

Angela M. Killian, of Lancaster, for
Respondent.

Elizabeth H. Rainey, of Rock Hill, and
Vanessa  Cason, of Greenville, for Guardian Ad Litem.

PER CURIAM:  Natasha P. appeals from the family court's order terminating her
parental rights to her minor child.  See S.C.
Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (2008).  Upon a thorough review of the record and the
family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law, pursuant to Ex Parte
Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues
warrant briefing.  Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.  

AFFIRMED.[1]

WILLIAMS, KONDUROS, JJ.,
and CURETON, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.