CourtListener 10153249•State v. Charles Owens
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Charles Edward Owens, Appellant.
Appeal from Cherokee County
Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-034
Submitted January 4, 2010 Filed January
26, 2010
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg,
for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Charles Edward Owens appeals his conviction for criminal sexual conduct
with a minor in the second degree. Owens argues the trial court erred as a
matter of law in submitting the charge of assault and battery of a high and
aggravated nature to the jury as he was not indicted for this offense. Owens'
counsel attached to the brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating
that she had reviewed the record and concluded that the appeal is without legal
merit sufficient to warrant a new trial. Owens filed a pro se brief.
After a thorough review of
the record, the pro se brief, and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to
be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, A.C.J.,
GEATHERS, J., and CURETON, A.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.