State v. Aaron Booker

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Aaron Maurice Booker, Appellant.

Appeal From Union County

John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-052

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed January
27, 2010   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Aaron Maurice Booker appeals the
revocation of his probation.  He contends the circuit court erred in revoking
his probation without finding his failure to pay fines and fees was willful. 
After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Booker's appeal and grant counsel's petition to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS,
and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.