CourtListener 10153158•SCDSS v. Tabitha Hutto-Spires
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Tabitha Hutto-Spires and Cecil Spires, Defendants,
Of whom Tabitha Hutto-Spires is the Appellant.
In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2024-000223
Appeal From Aiken County
Angela W. Abstance, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2024-UP-280
Submitted July 19, 2024 – Filed July 24, 2024
AFFIRMED
Jennifer Lynn Mook, of Law Office of Jennifer Mook,
LLC, of Aiken, for Appellant.
Andrew Troy Potter, of Anderson, for Respondent.
Amy Patterson Shumpert, of Nance & McCants, of
Aiken, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Tabitha Hutto-Spires appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2023). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.
AFFIRMED. 1
THOMAS, MCDONALD, and VERDIN, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.