SCDSS v. Colleen Dagg

CourtListener 10153136Scctapp10.06.2024

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Colleen Dagg and Kesan Johnson (deceased),
Defendants,

Of whom Colleen Dagg is the Appellant.

In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2024-000108

Appeal From Horry County
Melissa M. Frazier, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2024-UP-210
Submitted June 6, 2024 – Filed June 10, 2024

AFFIRMED

Melanie Carol Nicholson, of Law Office of Melanie C.
Nicholson, of North Myrtle Beach, for Appellant.

William Evan Reynolds, of Kingstree, for Respondent.
Michael Julius Schwartz, of Russell B. Long, PA, of
Myrtle Beach, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Colleen Dagg appeals the family court's final order terminating
her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp.
2023). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of
fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly,
we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Dagg's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

THOMAS, MCDONALD, and VERDIN, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.