CourtListener 10153002•Robert Aikey v. Brittney Goehrig
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
Robert Aikey and Cynthia Aikey, Respondents,
v.
Brittney Goehrig (a/k/a Brittney D. Dehart), John
Kenneth Goehrig, and John Doe, Defendants,
Of Whom Brittney Goehrig (a/k/a Brittney D. Dehart) is
the Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2023-000046
Appeal From York County
Thomas Henry White, IV, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2024-UP-112
Submitted March 26, 2024 – Filed March 27, 2024
AFFIRMED
John Brandt Rucker and Allyson Sue Rucker, both of
The Rucker Law Firm, LLC, of Greenville, for
Appellant.
Thomas M. Neal, III, of Law Offices of Thomas M. Neal,
III, of Columbia; and April Dawn Porter, of Law Office
of April D. Porter, P.C., of Rock Hill, both for
Respondents.
Bruce M. Poore, of Rock Hill, as the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Brittney Goehrig appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2023). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.
AFFIRMED. 1
WILLIAMS, C.J., KONDUROS, J., and LOCKEMY, A.J., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.