State v. Walter Alexander Palacios

CourtListener 10152725Scctapp26.04.2023

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Walter Alexander Palacios, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2021-000620

Appeal From Colleton County
DeAndrea G. Benjamin, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2023-UP-163
Submitted April 1, 2023 – Filed April 26, 2023

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of
Columbia, and Walter A. Palacios, pro se, both for
Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch,
Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED. 1

WILLIAMS, C.J., and GEATHERS and VERDIN, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.