CourtListener 10152693•State v. Lamont Antonio Samuel
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Lamont Antonio Samuel, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2020-001612
Appeal From Orangeburg County
Thomas Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2023-UP-092
Submitted November 1, 2022 – Filed March 15, 2023
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1
WILLIAMS, C.J., and THOMAS, J., and LOCKEMY, A.J., concur.
1
We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.