CourtListener 10152663•In the Matter of Craig A. Carroll (2)
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Craig A.
Carroll, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2020-000697
Appeal From Berkeley County
Roger M. Young, Sr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2023-UP-043
Submitted January 1, 2023 – Filed February 1, 2023
AFFIRMED
James Kristian Falk, of Falk Law Firm, LLC, of
Charleston, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Craig Allen Carroll appeals the trial court's order denying his
request for a jury trial to determine his fitness for release from the South Carolina
Sexually Violent Predator Treatment Program. Because evidence in the record
reasonably supports the trial court's order, we affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b),
SCACR, and the following authorities: In re Care & Treatment of Tucker, 353 S.C.
466, 470, 578 S.E.2d 719, 721 (2003) ("On review, the appellate court will not
disturb the hearing court's finding on probable cause unless found to be without
evidence that reasonably supports the hearing court's finding."); id. at 470, 578
S.E.2d at 722 ("In a [section] 44-48-110 probable cause hearing, the committed
person has the burden of showing the hearing court that probable cause exists to
believe that his mental condition has so changed that he is safe to be released.");
S.C. Code Ann. § 44-48-110 (2018) ("If the court determines that probable cause
exists to believe that the person's mental abnormality or personality disorder has so
changed that the person is safe to be at large and, if released, is not likely to
commit acts of sexual violence, the court must schedule a trial on the issue.").
AFFIRMED. 1
GEATHERS, MCDONALD, and HILL, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.