SCDSS v. Robinson

CourtListener 10152637Scctapp13.02.2023

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Shaquille Robinson and Anthony Swinger, Defendants,

Of whom Shaquille Robinson is the Appellant.

In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2022-001049

Appeal From Anderson County
Karen F. Ballenger, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2023-UP-061
Submitted February 10, 2023 – Filed February 13, 2023

AFFIRMED

Robert Mills Ariail, Jr., of Law Office of R. Mills Ariail,
Jr., of Greenville; and Nima Fiuzat, of Clemson, both for
Appellant.

Gregory Lee Cole, Jr., of Cox & Cole, Attorneys at Law,
of Williamston, as Guardian ad Litem for Appellant.
Andrew Troy Potter, of Anderson, for Respondent.

John Marshall Swails, Jr., of Greenville, for the Guardian
ad Litem for the minor child.

PER CURIAM: Shaquille Robinson appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2022). Upon a thorough review of Robinson's pro se response,
the record, and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant
to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious
issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and
relieve Robinson's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

THOMAS, MCDONALD, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.