Salmans v. McDonald

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Serena Joy Stacy Salmans and Dillon Levi Salmans,
Respondents,

v.

Nakeisha McDonald, Charles Sabb, and South Carolina
Department of Social Services, Defendants,

Of whom Nakeisha McDonald is the Appellant

and

Charles Sabb and South Carolina Department of Social
Services are Respondents.

In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2022-001136

Appeal From Richland County
C. Vance Stricklin, Jr., Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2023-UP-018
Submitted January 5, 2023 – Filed January 12, 2023

AFFIRMED
Melinda Inman Butler, of The Butler Law Firm, of
Union, for Appellant.

Larry Dale Dove, of Thompson Dove Law Group LLC,
of Rock Hill, for Respondents Serena Joy Stacy Salmans
and Dillon Levi Salmans.

Scarlet Bell Moore, of Greenville, for Respondent South
Carolina Department of Social Services.

Charles Saab, of North Charleston, pro se.

Almand James Barron, of The Law Offices of Shea and
Barron, of Columbia, as the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Nakeisha McDonald appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2022). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve McDonald's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

KONDUROS, HEWITT, and VINSON, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.