State v. Quincy L. Hemphill

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Quincy Lakeith Hemphill, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2019-001807

Appeal From York County
William A. McKinnon, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-448
Submitted November 1, 2022 – Filed December 14, 2022

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M.
Blitch, Jr., of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1

WILLIAMS, C.J., THOMAS, J., and LOCKEMY, A.J., concur.

1
We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.