CourtListener 10152556•SCDSS v. Amber M. Nalley
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Amber Michelle Nalley a/k/a Amber Smith and Walter
Jason Smith, Defendants,
Of whom Amber Michelle Nalley a/k/a Amber Smith is
the Appellant.
In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2022-001090
Appeal From Greenville County
Rochelle Y. Conits, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-461
Submitted December 13, 2022 – Filed December 16, 2022
AFFIRMED
Matthew P. Head, of Head Law Firm, LLC, of
Greenville, for Appellant.
Rebecca Rush Wray, of South Carolina Department of
Social Services, of Greenville, for Respondent.
Megan Goodwin Burke, of Greenville, for the Guardian
ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Amber Nalley appeals the family court's final order terminating
her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp.
2022). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of
fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly,
we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Nalley's counsel.
AFFIRMED. 1
GEATHERS, MCDONALD, and HILL, JJ. concur.
1
We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.