Michael Watson v. State

CourtListener 10152517Scctapp30.11.2022

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Michael D. Watson, Petitioner,

v.

State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2018-000486

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Appeal From Saluda County
R. Keith Kelly, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-426
Submitted November 1, 2022 – Filed November 30, 2022

CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY
GRANTED

David Alexander, of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Attorney General David A. Spencer, both of
Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: We granted Michael D. Watson's petition for a writ of certiorari
to review the post-conviction relief court's denial of relief. After careful
consideration of the Appendix and briefs, we now dismiss the writ as
improvidently granted. 1

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

KONDUROS, HEWITT, and VINSON, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.