CourtListener 10152501•SCDSS v. Debbie F. Beam
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Debbie Faye Beam, Daniel Thomas Williams, and
Christopher Lynn Beam, Defendants,
Of whom Debbie Faye Beam is the Appellant
and
Daniel Thomas Williams is a Respondent.
In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2022-000477
Appeal From Spartanburg County
Usha J. Bridges, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-388
Submitted October 12, 2022 – Filed October 18, 2022
AFFIRMED
Nancy Carol Fennell, of Irmo, for Appellant.
Alex Kinlaw, III, of Greenville, as Guardian ad Litem for
Appellant.
John Brandt Rucker, of The Rucker Law Firm, LLC, of
Greenville, for Respondent Daniel Thomas Williams.
Jonathan Ashley Neal, of South Carolina Department of
Social Services, of Spartanburg, for Respondent South
Carolina Department of Social Services.
Jamia Diann Foster, of Law Office of Jamia D. Foster
LLC, of Spartanburg, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Debbie Faye Beam appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2022). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Beam's counsel.
AFFIRMED. 1
WILLIAMS, C.J., THOMAS, J., and LOCKEMY, A.J., concur.
1
We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.