CourtListener 10152244•SCDSS v. Brown
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Rudlen T. Brown, Jacques Denard, John Doe,
Defendants,
Of whom Rudlen T. Brown is the Appellant.
In the interest of minors under the age of 18.
Appellate Case No. 2021-000748
Appeal From Sumter County
Angela R. Taylor, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-143
Submitted March 17, 2022 – Filed March 18, 2022
AFFIRMED
Kimberly Yancey Brooks, of Kimberly Y. Brooks,
Attorney at Law, of Greenville, for Appellant.
Steve Bernard Suchomski, of South Carolina Department
of Social Services, of Sumter, for Respondent.
John Stephen Keffer, of Young, Keffer & Donnald, PA,
of Sumter, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Rudlen T. Brown appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2021). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Brown's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1
WILLIAMS, C.J., and KONDUROS and VINSON, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.